21 results for 'cat:"Civil Procedure" AND cat:"Injunction"'.
J. Jenkins vacates the judgment ordering that a father shall no longer communicate with his children's school because that judgment is not a custody judgment but is a permanent injunction. In this case, a trial on the permanent injunction never took place. Further, the trial court failed to implement the correct procedures at an earlier hearing by not holding a full trial on the merits before ruling on a principal dispute. Vacated.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Jenkins, Filed On: April 3, 2024, Case #: 2023-CA-0502, Categories: civil Procedure, Family Law, injunction
J. Kelly finds that the trial court improperly ordered a hosting facility to restore electricity to a premises used by a bitcoin mining operation. The trial court's injunction fails to satisfy the requirement under the rules of Civil Procedure 683 that temporary injunctions describe in "specific" and "reasonable detail" the acts being restrained. Reversed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Kelly, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 03-23-00853-CV, Categories: civil Procedure, Corporations, injunction
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Thapar finds the employee's appeal of a lower court's injunction to prevent her working for a competitor was mooted by the parties' delay in filing their briefs, which were not filed until after the expiration of the one-year noncompete portion of her agreement with her former employer. Although the employee might recover damages for lost income if she prevails on the merits of the dispute, that only involves the underlying case.
Court: 6th Circuit, Judge: Thapar, Filed On: February 22, 2024, Case #: 23-1028, Categories: civil Procedure, injunction
Per curiam, the Supreme Court of Colorado grants petitioners' request to permanently enjoin the vexatious litigator from filing any lawsuits, appeals or motions with any court in the state, ruling her actions - both as a licensed attorney and a pro se litigant following disbarment - show a total lack of respect for the legal system and have accomplished nothing other than inundating the court system and frustrating her opposing parties with frivolous filings.
Court: Colorado Supreme Court, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: February 20, 2024, Case #: 2024CO8, Categories: civil Procedure, Sanctions, injunction
Vice Chancellor Will denies an injunction pending appeal of the post-trial opinion finding that a shareholder failed to meet advance notice bylaws in nominating board directors because delaying the shareholder meeting would be inequitable, and an injunction pending appeal is unwarranted under the "Kirpat" factors
Court: Delaware Chancery Court, Judge: Will, Filed On: January 5, 2024, Case #: 2023-0879-LWW, Categories: civil Procedure, injunction
J. Molberg finds that a temporary injunction should be dissolved as void in this dispute involving a student's "AP statistics course grade." The temporary injunction, which enjoins the school from engaging in certain communications regarding the student, lacks the necessary specificity "as to the probable, imminent and irreparable harm required." Reversed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Molberg, Filed On: June 30, 2023, Case #: 05-22-01187-CV, Categories: civil Procedure, Education, injunction
J. Phipps finds that the trial court properly denied the county's motion to dismiss the developer's mandamus, declaratory and injunctive relief action challenging a rezoning decision. The trial court correctly found that the decision on the rezoning request was legislative rather than quasi-judicial and did not require a writ of certiorari to proceed. Affirmed.
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals, Judge: Phipps, Filed On: June 29, 2023, Case #: A23A0055, Categories: civil Procedure, injunction
J. Harris finds the trial court correctly denied the sand mine company's motion to dissolve a temporary injunction entered against it, but it incorrectly failed to follow Florida law and set an amount for bond funds agreed to by both parties to be held in case the company is found to have been wrongfully enjoined. The case is remanded back to the trial court to hold a hearing to figure out if the parties agreed to waive a bond or, if not, what a proper bond amount would be. Affirmed in part.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Harris, Filed On: May 26, 2023, Case #: 22-1201, Categories: civil Procedure, injunction